K50,000.00 REWARD FOR INFORMATION

Well the heat just got turned up. I had just posted PNG Blogs update of the NASFUND scandal here this morning.

And look what just popped into my inbox?

——————————————————–

The NASFUND Board is aware of various articles posted on the blog site, PNG BLOGS and now being circulated via e mail which are factually incorrect, malicious in nature and defamatory. The articles are not only a serious attack on the integrity of the NASFUND Board and management it is a mischievous attempt to create confusion and instability amongst the contributors of NASFUND.

The author of these articles has used the cloak of anonymity aided by the named website in perpetrating this cowardly and criminal smear campaign.

An investigation to establish the identities of the persons involved is ongoing and a reward of K50,000.00 is now offered for information leading to the identification, arrest and prosecution of both the author of the articles and the persons responsible for publishing it on this blog or any general media.

All information received shall be treated confidentially and should be forwarded to:

Ernie Gangloff
Independent ex Officio NASFUND Board
C/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Level 12 Deloitte
P.O. Box 1275
Port Moresby
Email: Egangloff@deloitte.com.pg

Authorized by:

NASFUND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

———————————————————————————

Joint CEO, Rod Mitchell’s Statement

I will preface this statement with the following quote from author Kevin Donnelly

“Deciding between competing rights and balancing rights with responsibilities is difficult and challenging, no more than in relation to freedom of religion, expression and belief. As common sense suggests, not all rights are absolute and there are occasions when particular rights have to be qualified or curtailed. Freedom of expression does not give one the licence to shout “fire” in a crowed cinema”

A number of issues in relation to allegations made on a blog site and reproduced in scurrilous form by email circulation through out PNG can be drawn from the above quotation.

1. That blogs far from being a democratic agent for change are now being used more and more as a tool for certain smear campaigns and agendas

2. In relation to allegations about me we can see that there is an agenda on a blog site to make any fanciful allegation without substantiation and use it to smear my character.

3. Nearly all the postings are written by the same person under different names. There also appears to be a racist overtone.

4. There should be an onus where people make unsubstantiated allegations that are designed to damage a persons reputation, for blog sites to not only state who they are, but also any article should be fully credited to the person who wrote it – not some glib “PNG Nationalist” etc

5. The whole approach on this blog goes against common law. What we have in these “blogs” is some Napoleonic approach of guilty until we say otherwise. And that also tells any thinking person of the hidden agenda at work here. Faceless people behind faceless, unsubstantiated muck raking.

On this I note the claims of one anonymous writer who believes the mere mention of claims of defamation suggest identification with corruption. Once again I state that no one begrudges fair comment. Malicious unsubstantiated allegations designed to hurt a person or company’s reputation is in a class of its own and the mere refuting of an allegation does not justify the malicious intent of the allegation in the first place. It is a shame that this particular website does not demand more accountability from those who comment and if it was a legitimate site you would expect a code of conduct regime in place – Not a policy of agenda driven anarchy.

It is clear that over the last few months there has been a concerted attempt to destabilize NASFUND, the Board and it’s Management by malicious rubbish. The most successful financial organisation in Papua New Guinea will not stand by idly and allow faceless people to dictate or set their hidden agenda against the organisation. I ask the Members and the public to hold firm and co operate in exposing the people behind the website and those who wrote the malicious commentary. Let them have their day in court and let their allegations be tested in a legitimate forum.

Rod Mitchell
NASFUND

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “K50,000.00 REWARD FOR INFORMATION

  1. If all or some of the allegation is true then so what?! You to can put your facts(or the lack there of ???) on the website or the blogs and let readers make up their own minds.PNG unlike China people have freedom of speech;if they choose to remain behind the pennames so be it:that too is their “laik”!You can write and tell your side of story to newspapers also.
    Putting up a reward for such freedom in PNG does not seem right at all.Try that dirty type of reward in Australia and boy you will get fired from the media and from every where.My advise to you is put everything down on paper and let the people judge for themselves.

    Thank goodness for the blogs and the various websites all over PNG and the world over;at least the voiceless majority do have a outlet.PNG may be just coming on board this mode of communication recently we will get a hang of this way of communication and we will run with it.
    So whatever is hidden now from the parliament down to the streets of PNG, all will be reveal in due course.We PNGs want the truth from the likes of you and others up there.How about it ?

  2. NasFund should rather tell the people how & why it approved the controversial K125 mil and who benefited from this deal including broker benefits? Why waste money to publishing cover up adds including the reward. Their email is also clogging systems and i head some org in PNG already blocked emails of that. And K50 000.00 Reward for what? Give this money to Port Moresby General Hospital or Laloki Mental Centre.

    Is this sign of tyranny on freedom of digital media? Sorry but rotten and corrupt ashs will be revealed for public to see and judge!

  3. NasFund would do better to answer queries about their dealings with MP Tammur and the serious allegations about the forgery of the PM ‘s signature and the breach of the Financial Management Act.
    Posting a reward of K50,000 for the ‘capture’ of those behind the postings on PNG Blogs just perpertuates further suspicion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s