Money grows on trees

Jun 6th 2009 – From

AT THE United Nations climate change conference in Bali two years ago, the head of the delegation from Papua New Guinea, Kevin Conrad, became a celebrity of sorts. He challenged America to lead the world on climate change or “get out of the way”. America, which had been insisting that poorer countries make more promises on fighting climate change, backed down. That allowed delegates to agree on a road map for setting up an international treaty to replace the existing Kyoto protocol.

Mr Conrad directs an organisation called the Coalition for Rainforest Nations, an alliance of 33 countries that promotes “avoided deforestation”—which means taking measures to prevent trees being chopped down. Deforestation accounts for about a fifth of the world’s emissions of greenhouse gases. The coalition argues that poor countries urgently need the revenue logging can bring. If rich countries want them to preserve their forests to keep the planet cool, they should provide some compensation for the forgone logging revenue. In other words, rich countries that are obliged to make reductions in carbon emissions under a new climate treaty could pay owners of forests to stop deforesting as a way of reducing carbon emissions.

The World Bank, the UN and various donor countries such as Norway are enthusiastic about the approach—partly after prodding by Papua New Guinea.

The proposed process for formalising such trading is known as REDD, which stands for reduction of emissions from deforestation and degradation. International talks are under way in Bonn as part of an attempt to decide how REDD would work. But for now the UN does not endorse any offsets based on avoided deforestation. Nor do rules apply to voluntary credits, such as those bought by airline passengers to offset the carbon emissions of their flights.

Even before agreement on which projects might qualify, a REDD market has emerged on the basis of promises to deliver carbon credits from pilot REDD projects. Some traders are willing to buy and sell on the assumption that real credits will be delivered one day. In 2008, REDD projects made up 14% of forest carbon “credits” traded on the voluntary credit market.

Such trading may be speculative, but it is legitimate. Yet no government is able to issue any legal REDD credit, as no framework exists for doing so. Indeed, even if REDD is formalised later this year, some expect that credits would be issued by third parties not governments. Nonetheless, the government of Papua New Guinea has apparently been issuing credits. For example, documents obtained by The Economist suggest that, on November 3rd 2008, the country’s Office of Climate Change (OCC), a part of the executive branch, issued REDD credits for 1m tonnes of carbon, supposedly under the proposed REDD mechanism.

Betha Somare, press secretary for the prime minister, said in a formal statement “the OCC has no legal mandate to issue any forest carbon credits, other than afforestation and reforestation through the Clean Development Mechanism, nor is there currently any REDD asset in existence due to a lack of a regulatory framework for forest carbon in Papua New Guinea”. Officials are now looking in to how REDD credits came to be issued.

Further investigation suggests that at least 39 more such REDD “credits”, which apparently each denote 1m tonnes of carbon, have been issued by the OCC for projects across the country in pilot projects of up to a dozen forests. One of the companies involved in the development of these forests as future REDD credits said a number of certificates had been issued by the OCC. These, it added, were “not real” but rather “symbolic” certificates.

One of these REDD carbon “credits” has caused particular outrage in the country. The area of forest is given as the “Kamula Duso REDD Project”. Yet the 800,000 hectares of virgin rainforest in Kamula Duso are at the heart of a long-running legal dispute over ownership, and the land is now the subject of a court injunction. Until the courts settle the legality of an agreement with the Forest Authority to permit logging, nobody is supposed to touch it.

The emergence of the Kamula Duso credit was one of the reasons for a crisis meeting of the country’s governors in May. All of the governors asked for the OCC to be referred to a public-accounts committee, and to undergo an audit. They also demanded that the office should be restrained from issuing any carbon credits or approving any carbon trade project. At the same time the governors also wrote to the Norwegian and Australian governments, the UNDP and the EU asking for aid funding to be suspended pending these inquiries.

The Economist has also obtained credits that were signed by a government minister in 2005 and that denote ownership in carbon sinks in relation to the Clean Development Mechanism. These credits are also now the subject of investigation by officials. As too is a financial arrangement that would have seen brokers provide money for running the OCC, should REDD be agreed.

Upon receiving a copy of the Kamula Duso credit last week, Ms Somare said, “very recently apparent irregularities within the OCC have come to our attention. As a result the prime minister has asked for a review to be carried out and a report to be made to his office. Other prudential measures are being taken within the OCC until the results of the review are available.” She added that the government could not say more at this stage while it was taking legal advice.

Kevin Conrad, interviewed last week, said it was too early to conclude what went wrong but said an “independent review” was under way. He added that “carbon speculators” were putting pressures on landowners in many countries to sell large tracts of forest ahead of a possible deal on avoided deforestation in Copenhagen later this year.

The broader issue with any kind of carbon credit, however, is ensuring that governments of poor countries behave impeccably. Indeed, if problems like this can happen in Mr Conrad’s own back yard, it suggests that the challenges ahead for REDD are tough ones.

Avoided deforestation is a big deal for climate-change policy. It is also a prize worth fighting for, even if it is hard to achieve. Poor governance, on top of poorly defined and defended forest property rights, mean that without proper care REDD could become a recipe for disaster rather than part of a solution the world needs.

4 thoughts on “Money grows on trees

  1. Yes behind closed doors Conrad on behalf of himself using PNG nominated ‘ article 2 ‘ and like Brazil are trying to exclude the human and environmental rights of PNG, and have referred support to Brazil via the The Colation of Forest Nations.
    Conrad support as from today ex-PM Somare has been stood down and ‘trials’ of many many obvious allegations are being prepared, the acting PM one of Conrads cronies will be forced out by party preference before Christmas.
    Conrad and his criminal offside Wari Iamo and their self appointed, are being Internationally reviewed.
    If you look at the Global Witness side event on the cop16 website (they have an on demand link), it looks like Brazil and PNG were the 2 countries pushing hardest against the safeguards. Maybe Bolivia should look at their neighbors for answers as to why safeguard text related to human and environmental rights was taken out?

    The CEO of the World Bank mentioned the ‘ Bird of Paradise” in this calculation.

    Are you ready for this one …..So the CEO of the World Bank wants ‘now’ to calculate all the native animals and birds on the planet and account them into a different carbon credit scheme.
    Although they push REDD and REDD+ which does nothing more than completely either totally remove or replace with a article biodiversity with re plantations of the planets habitation. without considering any part of the inhabits environment.
    I wonder if indigenous people are in these calculations????
    It seems they have a weird idea of formulating a global ‘zoo’ amongst plantations and probably resorts and golf courses, who knows.
    It is most definite though,that too much world university education and political correctness is turning our world into…. long long ting ting (crazy), and its being replaced from common sense.
    So many Indigenous people throughout recorded history from the worlds “Indigenous records of world events” , have stated these same European and Asian predators world wide have been guilty of Indigenous invasions since before Christ.

  2. REDD fails acid test: Landowner post courier PNG today

    With the recent announcement by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) over the weekend that it will be 2020 before a REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation) or REDD+ project can be paid for by the donation nations, any hope that all the talk about REDD in PNG would amount to anything is effectively killed.
    “This is a betrayal of our people,” said Timothy Tepi, who has a voluntary carbon trading project in East Pangia, “the people who have been pushing this REDD in the Government have been lying to us for years, trying to take away our land rights, and keep all the money for themselves.
    “They fly around the world, go to all these conferences, eat at the best restaurants, all at the expense of the PNG people, while we all starve.”
    Mr Tepi is the chairman of Tiyebo and Associates Tribes of East Pangia Ltd, a registered company that is starting the East Pangia carbon trading project.
    Kirk William Roberts, who is known as the person responsible for getting ready the first voluntary carbon trading project in Kamula Doso, also pointed out that certain people who were fraudulently claiming to be landowners were trying to discredit the voluntary carbon standard (VCS), the worldwide standards organisation, while claiming that the process was “risky”.
    “The VCS is the most established standards organisation available, and the only one with a worldwide track record of having verified carbon trading projects with registered credits being sold on the world markets,” Mr Roberts said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s